What is quality content to you?

[Shawn Gossman]

How do you feel about quality content on your forum?

How would you define it? What does the content need to accomplish to be quality content?

What kind of content would you call low quality?

[Wayne]

This one’s tricky to pin down. Keeping users engaged means to avoid bothering them with flags for borderline content, because what qualifies as "high-quality" often depends on perspective. As long as the content is reasonably on-topic, not frequent cut/paste items (links to news sites, for example) and not inflammatory, it should pass the bar for acceptable quality.

Would you agree?

[Shawn Gossman]

I agree with that.

If the topic results in engagement, it's quality IMO, even if it's one-liner content.